California voters rejected Proposition 3. Where now on water?

In this Feb. 25, 2016 file photo, water flows through an irrigation canal to crops near Lemoore, Calif. Rich Pedroncelli AP

California voters have rejected Proposition 3, the $8.9 billion water bond, sending a message to politicians. But what is that message?

It can’t be that the state’s water problems have been solved. They haven’t been.

It can’t be that Californians don’t care about water. Poll after poll shows we do.

And it certainly doesn’t mean that more money – and potentially a lot of money – isn’t still needed to modernize our water systems. It is.

Maybe the message is that it’s time to look for a different approach. Instead of a costly bond that puts more pressure on the state’s general fund, legislators should consider fees tied directly to the amount of water people use.

California voters have approved about $60 billion (in 2018 dollars) for water projects since 1960. They just approved more than $4 billion in June for new land and water bonds. Proposition 3, which would have cost taxpayers about $17 billion over 40 years with interest factored in, might have been too much for voters to bear.

A water user fee would be simple: a tiny charge on all surface and groundwater withdrawals. We have similar fees already on energy, cell phones, and other basic utility services.

A modest user fee of only $20 per acre-foot of water, or $0.0006 per gallon, would generate $800 million per year. Such a fee would raise my home water bill by less than 50 cents per month.

The money raised should be committed to water projects with a clear public benefit and communities that cannot afford adequate water services. It could fund […]

More about water infrastructure:

New York City’s $1 Billion Leaking Water Infrastructure Repair

Opinion: Infrastructure Bill Shouldn’t Ignore Our Aging Water Systems

10 facts about water policy and infrastructure in the USA

San Francisco’s green-grey infrastructure

Why it’s time to rebuild America’s water infrastructure

Ozone Park Infrastructure Project Delivering 200 New Trees to Community

Summary
California Voters rejected Proposition 3. Where now on water?
Article Name
California Voters rejected Proposition 3. Where now on water?
Description
California voters rejected an $8.9 billion water bond, sending a message to politicians. But what message? Perhaps that a fresh approach is needed. (2018)
Author
Publisher Name
Sacramento Bee
Publisher Logo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *