Healthy ecosystems are good for everyone in California—they provide us with abundant wildlife and fisheries, clean drinking water, and needed space in nature for recreation, among other benefits. Here at the PPIC Water Policy Center, we’ve studied restoration issues in the past—including the importance of restoring more natural flow patterns, improving permitting, and storing water for the environment. This year we brought in three CalTrout Ecosystem Fellows to look at another major challenge in river restoration: community engagement.
There is a lot of literature on the importance of stakeholder engagement in restoration work. Studies in the US and internationally have shown that robust engagement can improve restoration outcomes. Yet project proponents frequently make erroneous assumptions when trying to engage community stakeholders, as a recent study of urban stream restoration illuminated. This includes assuming that community members and those proposing restoration actions have the same goals; that education and outreach alone will create community support; and that the community will benefit from restoration, and thus support it.
In addition to illuminating—and not falling prey to—these assumptions, proponents of restoration work must clear other major hurdles. These include:
Full article: www.ppic.org
Photo Credit: iStock The lake supports nearly 300 species of birds, mammals, and fish, as…
Map: A 3D view with basemap transparency adjusted to show underground wells, with filtering by…
As part of SF Climate Week, KQED’s Danielle Venton sat down with the California Secretary…
JT Chevallier and JB Harris operate BEBOT during a demo on Tallac Beach, June 15,…
The Biden administration announced new protections for millions of acres of wetlands, which are essential…
Photo: Adobe Stock / Romolo Tavani For many California industrial facilities, above average rainfall brought 60-day…